http://chiefpricingofficer.com/2009/03/24/guest-post-mike-neal-ceo-signaldemand/ Bringing Science to Pricing Decisions Everyday Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:20:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://chiefpricingofficer.com/2009/03/24/guest-post-mike-neal-ceo-signaldemand/comment-page-1/#comment-133 Mike Neal Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:33:40 +0000 http://chiefpricingofficer.com/?p=209#comment-133 I completely agree with you. Good price forecasts, for example, in the hands of growers will create benefits to both grower and processor. The benefits to trading partners from collaborating vs. negotiating are significant no matter where in the value chain you are, from farm to fork. I completely agree with you. Good price forecasts, for example, in the hands of growers will create benefits to both grower and processor. The benefits to trading partners from collaborating vs. negotiating are significant no matter where in the value chain you are, from farm to fork.

]]> http://chiefpricingofficer.com/2009/03/24/guest-post-mike-neal-ceo-signaldemand/comment-page-1/#comment-100 David Moss Sun, 10 May 2009 15:09:02 +0000 http://chiefpricingofficer.com/?p=209#comment-100 This win-win...win synergy must be extended to the primary product stage as well. Can SignalDemand reach out to the primary suppliers to afford them the same market signals and product demand indicators? It would appears to me the solution your company provides to the processor is "one up" to his customer; can it be designed to provide solutions in both directions - i.e. "one down"? Say hi to Bill Rupp, by the way! This win-win…win synergy must be extended to the primary product stage as well. Can SignalDemand reach out to the primary suppliers to afford them the same market signals and product demand indicators? It would appears to me the solution your company provides to the processor is “one up” to his customer; can it be designed to provide solutions in both directions - i.e. “one down”? Say hi to Bill Rupp, by the way!

]]>